17 September 2025

Atlas Subluxation Complex and Dizziness

in Scientific
0

Atlas Subluxation Complex, National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association Intervention, and Dizziness Improvement: A Narrative Review of Historical Perspectives, Literature Synthesis, and a Path for Future Care

Abstract

Dizziness is a non-specific and common condition in which the afflicted individual experiences abnormal sensations such as lightheadedness, imbalance, or a false sense of spinning (vertigo). The experience of “dizziness” can result from a wide spectrum of abnormal physiological states, including exhaustion, hypotension, and hypoglycemia, but could also indicate a serious underlying health issue. Since it has many potential generating causes, accurate identification of the underlying etiology of dizziness can present a challenge to clinicians, often resulting in ineffective treatments. We present a hypothesis that atlas subluxation complex (ASC) may comprise an etiological agent of dizziness that can be successfully addressed with National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association (NUCCA) chiropractic care. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology of the ASC, introduce the NUCCA chiropractic procedure, and complete a literature review and synthesis. Conceptual evidence, case reports, and theory provide foundational evidence that the ASC may be a contributory factor of dizziness generation and that NUCCA chiropractic corrective care of the ASC may produce favorable dizziness outcomes. However, high-quality studies are lacking. The foundation evidence provides indication that further research via observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is warranted.

Introduction & Background

Background

Dizziness is a common condition, affecting over 20% of adults in the United States annually [1,2]. “Dizziness” is a term used to describe many sensations, such as vertigo (a false sense of spinning), lightheadedness (a sense of floating and faintness), and imbalance. Dizziness is one of the top reasons geriatric patients visit their primary care provider [1,2]. Though benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common cause of vertigo and has a resounding cure rate, this is not the case for chronic conditions that cause dizziness [3,4]. Unfortunately, overall, the diagnosis of the generating cause of dizziness is suboptimal, and the treatments are relatively ineffective, leaving about half of patients with long-term disability [4,5]. Dizziness patients don’t always fit into the perfect “diagnostic box” either [1]. These staggering facts present the need for better diagnostics, more informed providers, and expanded treatment options. In this narrative review, we present a hypothesis that atlas subluxation complex (ASC) may comprise an etiological agent of dizziness and evaluate the potential role of the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association (NUCCA) corrective care of ASC in addressing the condition of dizziness.

Definitions

Due to dizziness being a non-specific diagnosis and used to describe many sensations, along with chiropractic historically having profession-unique nomenclature, this review shall use the following descriptions for its definitions (Table 1). The definitions were compiled from recent PubMed® indexed papers, the published NUCCA standards and protocols consensus, the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Bárány Society’s Consensus papers [6].

Term Definition Comment
Vertigo The sensation of self-motion when no self-motion is occurring or the sensation of distorted self-motion during an otherwise normal head movement. No comment
Dizziness The sensation of disturbed or impaired spatial orientation without a false or distorted sense of motion. No comment
Vestibulo-visual symptoms Visual symptoms that usually result from vestibular pathology or the interplay between visual and vestibular systems. These include false sensations of motion or tilting of the visual surround and visual distortion (blur) linked to vestibular (rather than optical) failure. No comment
Postural symptoms Balance symptoms related to maintenance of postural stability, occurring only while upright (seated, standing, or walking). No comment
Lightheadedness The feeling of impending blackout or faint in the absence of spinning and positional vertigo. No comment
ASC © This term is a neologism intended to denote the far reaching and damaging effects of the subluxated occipital-atlanto-axial area of the cervical spine upon the spinal column and the human organism. It differs in meaning from the commonly used chiropractic term “atlas subluxation” or “atlas-axis subluxation” in that the term “atlas subluxation complex” embraces the demonstrable mechanical and neurological phenomena which, through research, have been found to be associated with the subluxation of the occipital-atlanto-axial spine. Therefore, by definition, the term includes the atlas vertebra in all its planes of misalignment, its positional relationship to the occiput, subjacent vertebrae and pelvis, inclusive of the excursions of these structures into any or all of the bodily orientation planes; and resulting in concomitant detriment to the susceptive neurological components. NUCCA definition: © Dr Ralph R. Gregory
ASC © A structural misalignment of the CCJ resulting in neuropathophysiological changes and bodily dysfunction. Layman’s simple definition
ASC Syndrome © In this term, the word “syndrome” is limited in meaning to include only the observable and measurable signs of an ASC: objective signs. ASC is defined, therefore, as those signs which are always present and measurable in proportion to the intensity of ASC: misalignment factors as shown by X-ray, resulting traction of the neurological component, presence of spastic contracture of the lumbar and pelvic musculature, distortion of the pelvic girdle, displacement of the body’s center of gravity, contractured leg, and deviation of the spinal segments from the vertical axis of the body. NUCCA definition: © Dr Ralph R. Gregory
Restoration Principle © The reduction to normal of the misalignment factors of the ASC. This includes all methods and systems that reduce to or towards normal, the misalignment factors of the ASC. The Restoration Principle, which is based upon specific and acceptable principles of misalignment reduction, therefore is a pre-determined and pre-directed process of correction. In further simplification, “The principle that misaligned vertebra must be maximally restored to normal.” NUCCA definition: © Dr Ralph R. Gregory
Misalignment factors The misalignment factors are the measurable misalignments of the vertebrae of the spinal column and the positional relationship of the occiput to the spinal column and include the relationship of these structures to the vertical axis of the body and into any and all planes of motion as well as the ratio of magnitude that exists between an excursion into any given plane to that of any other plane of motion. No comment
CCJ The junction of the base of the skull and the cervical spine, including the occipital bone, surrounding the foramen magnum (occiput) (C0), C1 (atlas), C2 (axis), and the intervening tendons and ligaments. The specialized articulations between the occipital condyles and the complex ligamentous system link these three structures into one functional unit. This includes neurovascular structures extending from the skull base to C2. No comment
CCJ misalignment Improper orthogonal positioning of the skull, atlas, axis, and lower neck in relation to one another. The CCJ misalignment is the structural component of the ASC. No comment
Vertebral subluxation Vertebrae that are misaligned relative to the vertical axis in one or more orientation planes resulting in neurological stresses which produce measurable distortion of the spine, pelvis, and contiguous structures. NUCCA definition
Vertebral subluxation A lesion or dysfunction in a joint or motion segment in which alignment, movement integrity, and/or physiological function are altered, although contact between joint surfaces remains intact. It is essentially a functional entity, which may influence biomechanical and neural integrity. WHO definition
UCLF A calculated and vectored manual force given by the chiropractor to the patient to reduce the misalignment factors; also commonly referred to as the “correction”, or the “adjustment”. UCLF is not a manipulation. Manipulation occurs when a joint is brought into its paraphysiological joint space with an HVLA force. UCLF has very little excursion and focuses on joint realignment. Manipulation’s primary goal is to restore motion to a fixated joint.
UCT A chiropractic specialty with an established set of procedures that uses image-guided analysis to measure misalignment factors, addresses the ASC, and uses UCLF as its intervention. The UCT organizations that belong to the International Chiropractors Association – Council on Upper Cervical Care are as follows: NUCCA, Orthospinology, Atlas Orthogonal, Advanced Orthogonal, Blair, Knee Chest Upper Cervical Society, Evolutionary Percussive Instrument Corrections, Grostic, and HIO
Table 1: Definitions [6-13]

ASC: Atlas subluxation complex; NUCCA: National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association; CCJ: Craniocervical junction; UCLF: Upper cervical low-force (procedure); UCT: Upper cervical technique; HVLA: High-velocity, low-amplitude; HIO: Hole-in-one

Historical overview

Chiropractic care is a separate and distinct healthcare discipline focusing on care of the functional condition of the spine with respect to its influence on the function and adaptability of the nervous system. In 1895, then energy healer D.D. Palmer was attempting to treat a patient with deafness that was acquired after a spinal trauma [14,15]. Palmer’s energetic treatments were ineffective, leading him to try new methods. He noticed the patient had what he perceived to be a spinal bone “out of place.” With ingenuity, Palmer decided to use a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) force by hand to manually direct the vertebra back into place (Figure 1). The patient reported a complete restoration of hearing after this treatment. Palmer termed this new practice as “chiropractic.”

Figure 1: D.D. Palmer showing how the chiropractor places his hands for an adjustment
Courtesy of Special Collections and Archives, Palmer College of Chiropractic. Published in NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association [16]. Permission was obtained from both sources for use in this article.

His son, B.J. Palmer, was known as the developer of the chiropractic profession [17]. Soon after the inception of chiropractic, B.J. took an interest in the idea that spinal misalignments were the leading cause of whole-body dysfunction. He named this vertebral abnormality a subluxation [18]. Though the term “subluxation” already existed to describe a minor, or “less than” a dislocation, Palmer rephrased it to mean a misalignment of spinal bones, placing physical pressure on neurological structures, resulting in “nerve interference” and ultimately end-organ disease [18]. Therefore, his definition required two components, the structural misalignment of spinal vertebrae and the resulting nerve interference. His intervention was the chiropractic adjustment, a vectored force by hand used to guide the vertebrae into proper alignment, relieving the nerve interference and restoring bodily function [18].

In 1931, a subset of the profession further focused on the analysis and postural correction of the upper neck region or craniocervical junction (CCJ), where they believed the primary subluxation of the spine existed [19]. Though proper research was almost non-existent at the time, they believed the CCJ region was the primary area of concern due to observation and its proximity to the brainstem. The belief was that subluxation of the CCJ lead to “secondary” subluxations elsewhere in the spine. Therefore, instead of focusing on addressing all of the spinal subluxations, their belief was that correcting the CCJ subluxation would fix the secondary subluxations.

The hole-in-one (HIO) technique was introduced as the first upper cervical chiropractic method. The method utilized radiographic imaging to objectively measure and assess the alignment of the atlas (C1). The measurements create a two-dimensional vector that the chiropractor would use to improve the alignment by administering an HVLA force using the atlas transverse process as the contact point with the patient lying on their side. The headpiece of the table used a cocking mechanism that allowed it to drop down about two centimeters during the adjustment for added movement. Figure 2 shows Palmer demonstrating how the chiropractor places his hands for an HIO adjustment.


Figure 2: B.J. Palmer showing how the chiropractor places his hands for a HIO adjustment
Courtesy of Special Collections and Archives, Palmer College of Chiropractic. Published in NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association [16]. Permission was obtained from both sources for use in this article.

HIO: Hole-in-one

The HIO concept was later expanded upon in 1938 by Dr John Grostic Sr and Dr Ralph R. Gregory, who wished to incorporate metrics to improve inter-practitioner reliability [19]. They introduced the concept of intra-procedural post-adjustment imaging to objectively measure alignment changes after the initial intervention. They created X-ray positioning equipment to reduce radiographic alignment errors (Figure 3). They also expanded upon the analysis to provide a three-dimensional vector for the adjustment [18]. The nasium radiograph view was added for more in-depth analysis (Figure 4). Emphasis was also added on the total orthogonal alignment of the center of the skull, atlas and axis (C1 and C2), and base of the cervical spine [18,19]. The adjustment, developed by Gregory, was updated to be low force and low amplitude, with no movement of the table headpiece. A recent study on inter-examiner reliability of the radiographic analysis using the NUCCA protocol found almost perfect agreement (>96%), without proportional bias [20].

Figure 3: Head clamps used for accurate X-ray positioning
Courtesy of and published in NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association [16]. Permission was obtained for use in this article.

Figure 4: NUCCA radiographs and analysis examples

Lateral cervical (left), nasium (middle), and vertex (right)

Courtesy of and published in NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association [16]. Permission was obtained for use in this article.

NUCCA: National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association

In 1966, Dr Ralph Gregory and colleagues formed the NUCCA organization to further expand the orthogonal chiropractic management of what Gregory referred to as the “atlas subluxation complex” (ASC) [19]. They chose the name to end the era of forming technique protocols around an individual figure as a leader.

One of the most significant expansions of NUCCA protocols, further developed by Dr Ralph Gregory, was the adjustment refinement broken down into several phases (Figure 5) [21]. NUCCA protocol was also defined by four major types of misalignment presentations. It enhanced the understanding of spinal biomechanics, from how the spine compensates for injury and added to the essential factors needed to correct the misalignment optimally (Figure 6) [22]. In 1971, NUCCA formed a research organization to scientifically scrutinize and advance the NUCCA procedure instead of relying on blind faith and philosophy, which was common at the time. Since then, the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Research Association (NUCCRA), now known as the Upper Cervical Research Foundation (UCRF), has studied and published findings on how the ASC impacts human health and how to optimize the NUCCA procedure [23].

Figure 5: NUCCA intervention setup showing step 2 of phase 1 (left), step 2 of phase 2 (middle), and step 6 of phase 5 (right) as a few examples of the entire process

Courtesy of and published in NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association [16]. Permission was obtained for use in this article.

NUCCA: National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association

Figure 6: The basic type 1 misalignment pattern (left) and the factors needed to correct the alignment (right)

Courtesy of and published in NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association [16]. Permission was obtained for use in this article.

The first mention of chiropractic being used for dizziness intervention was in 1906 when Palmer published, “vertigo [is] the result of deranged nerves” [24]. Over 100 years later, NUCCA practitioners continue to care for patients with dizziness. Advertisements and online discussions regularly host NUCCA chiropractors suggesting their care is effective for dizziness from Ménière’s disease (MD). However, as health care and health sciences continue to move towards an evidence-informed model, we must examine the available evidence and identify gaps. This narrative review shall accomplish the following: 1) synthesize the available evidence that the ASC may generate dizziness; 2) synthesize the available evidence on NUCCA intervention’s effect on dizziness; 3) report on gaps in the knowledge base to guide future research.

Review

Methods

Databases and Inclusion Criteria

Index to Chiropractic Literature (ICL), PubMed®, and Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews (CLSR) databases were searched using the terms “NUCCA AND Dizziness”, “Atlas Subluxation AND Dizziness”, “Upper Cervical Spine AND Dizziness”, “Craniocervical Junction AND Dizziness”, and “Chiropractic AND Meniere’s” from 2014 through July 2024. Articles selected for the synthesis met one or more of the following inclusion criteria: (1a) specifies using upper cervical technique (UCT) for the ASC; (1b) human subject(s); (1c) diagnosed with “dizziness”; or (2) basic science research on the ASC affecting vestibular anatomy. Articles that used spinal manipulation, or any other form of manual therapy that is not UCT, were excluded. The search results are found in Table 2.

Database Search Terms Number of Hits Number of Papers Meeting Criteria
ICL NUCCA AND Dizziness 3 3
ICL Atlas Subluxation AND Dizziness 9 7
ICL Upper Cervical Spine AND Dizziness 8 5
ICL Craniocervical Junction AND Dizziness 1 1
ICL Chiropractic AND Meniere’s 11 8
PubMed® NUCCA AND Dizziness 0 0
PubMed® Atlas Subluxation AND Dizziness 4 0
PubMed® Upper Cervical Spine AND Dizziness 49 0
PubMed® Craniocervical Junction AND Dizziness 15 0
PubMed® Chiropractic AND Meniere’s 2 0
CLSR NUCCA AND Dizziness 0 0
CLSR Atlas Subluxation AND Dizziness 0 0
CLSR Upper Cervical Spine AND Dizziness 22 0
CLSR Craniocervical Junction AND Dizziness 0 0
CLSR Chiropractic AND Meniere’s 0 0
TOTAL Not Applicable 124 24

Discussion

Literature Synthesis

124 total papers were identified. 24 papers matched the inclusion criteria for synthesis by clearly identifying ASC as a clinical entity in a patient that was diagnosed with dizziness and who underwent upper cervical low-force (UCLF) care. Of these papers, 10 appeared in multiple searches, leaving 14 original articles. All 14 articles were case studies or series reporting on 20 total patients (Table 3). Taken together, this collection of case studies comprises a cohort of dizziness patients who harbored ASC, and who experienced improvement or resolution of their symptoms after UCLF care. No experimental studies such as clinical trials, basic science studies, or review articles were found in this search, leaving the results susceptible to bias and placebo effects. Of the 14 case studies/series, three were specific to NUCCA UCT, while 11 utilized a different UCT as their intervention. Of the 14 case studies, the dizziness-generating diagnoses were as follows: five involved concussion or other physical trauma to the CCJ, seven involved MD, one involved primary CNS tumor, and one involved dysautonomia to include low heart rate. Listed below are multiple conditions found within the literature review and are discussed in further detail how the ASC is relevant to each condition, how NUCCA intervention may improve outcomes, and further research recommendations.

Author Date Published UCT Used Diagnosis Study Design Comments
Berner, Steward 03/14/2020 Orthospinology MD Case report 68-yo female with self-reported symptom improvement
Chung 08/31/2019 NUCCA Post-concussion syndrome Case series of two 16-yo female and 30-yo female with self-reported symptom improvement
Moore 02/11/2019 NUCCA Post-concussion syndrome Case series of six Age ranges from 39 to 82 with objective outcome measure improvement
Finn, Ierano, Doyle 06/16/2022 Atlas Orthogonal Axial trauma Case report 49-yo female with subjective improvement and self-reported quality of life improvement
Burcon 05/10/2021 HIO MD and concussion Case report 51-yo female with subjective improvement stating her vertigo went from a 10 to a 1
Osborne, Rauch 01/27/2021 Atlas Orthogonal Dysautonomia Case report 74-yo female with objective heart rate variability changes and subjective improvements
Null, Null 03/04/2019 Grostic Traumatic brain injury Case report 19-yo male with self-reported improvement
Ball 07/03/2017 HIO Primary CNS tumor Case report Unspecified age and gender with objective outcome measurement improvement
Burcon 03/21/2023 HIO MD Case report 48-yo female with self-reported symptom resolution of all complaints except hearing loss
Belcher, Barnes 12/19/2022 Atlas Orthogonal MD Case report 59-yo female with self-reported resolution of vertigo
Malachowski, Britt 08/17/2020 Knee Chest Upper Cervical Specific MD Case report 64-yo female with self-reported improvement
Grey, Ellis 09/30/2019 Blair MD Case report 59-yo female with positive improvement
Chung, O’Connell 01/09/2017 NUCCA MD Case report 45-yo male with self-reported quality of life improvement and symptom resolution
Pennington, Miller 11/30/2015 Atlas Orthogonal MD Case report 63-yo female with reported symptom reduction
Table 3: Summary of literature review [25-38]

NUCCA: National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association; MD: Ménière’s disease; HIO: Hole-in-one

ASC as a Cause or Contribution to Dizziness: Pathophysiology

Four mechanistic rationales exist in the literature to explain how the ASC can cause or contribute to the generation of dizziness. The four, described below, are: proprioceptive dysafferentation, craniospinal hydrodynamic dysfunction, direct mechanical irritation from spinal cord tension, and venous compression from spinal cord tension.

Proprioceptive dysafferentation: Also referred to as somatosensory input hypothesis, proprioceptive dysafferentation holds the highest level of biological plausability and most significant scientific community acceptance regarding dizziness resulting from cervical soft tissue according to the Bárány Society [39]. Mechanoreceptors are a group of proprioceptors within the sensory portion of the nervous system [40]. Their function is to relay tactile sensations and position sense to the neuroaxis. The muscle spindle mechanoreceptors are located in musculoskeletal tissue and respond to length and stretch changes. Muscle spindles are in great abundance within the suboccipital muscles [41,42]. A positional change of only 0.4º in the upper cervical spine is sufficient to cause an increase in afferent discharge [43]. The central vestibular system relies on a constant sensory flow of peripheral information for processing spatial awareness. At rest, the healthy and normal functioning visual and vestibular labyrinth organs relay their typical afferents. However, if the ASC is present, it is hypothesized proprioceptive afferents will increase, resulting in a sensory mismatch and dizziness.

Craniospinal hydrodynamic dysfunction: A new area of investigation into how the ASC can cause neurological dysfunction, and ultimately dizziness, is through hydrodynamics [11,44-46]. The CCJ is an essential and sensitive anatomical convergence for all fluids moving to and from the brain. An uninterrupted inward flow of arterial blood, outward flow of venous blood, lymphatic movements, and dual movement of cerebral spinal fluid must occur for proper brain and nerve function [10,11]. An obstruction to the arterial blood to the brain is one of the leading causes of death worldwide [47]. However, a non-obstructed, functional reduction of arterial flow can result in nervous dysfunction, such as in cerebral hypoperfusion from orthostatic hypotension, which is known to cause dizziness [7,48,49]. Flammer researched and reported on non-obstructive, functional hypoperfusion of the optic nerve resulting in visual acuity problems, which could also be expected to result in the experience of dizziness [50]. Since the vertebral artery makes four 90º turns within the CCJ and traverses through the atlas transverse processes, it is susceptible to obstruction of blood flow from bony malposition; 20% of cervical rotation and extension is enough to limit blood flow [51-54]. A transverse misalignment of the atlas (rotated atlas) over the axis would potentially reduce the amount of cervical rotation and extension needed to restrict the lumen. The vertebral artery eventually branches off to supply nutrients to the vestibular nuclei [55]. A misalignment of the CCJ may ultimately lead to hypoperfusion of the vestibular nuclei, resulting in dizziness. A clinical component of Wallenberg syndrome, which is a blockage of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) that supplies blood to the central vestibular anatomy, is vertigo [52]. Therefore, hypoperfusion, but not complete blockage, is hypothesized to result in vertigo/dizziness as well. Since the CSF has cranial-caudal movement through the C0, C1, and C2 vertebrae of the CCJ, the flow pattern is also susceptible to bony misalignment, particularly from the dentate-ligament spinal cord-distortion hypothesis, as discussed in the next section [11,56]. The CSF traverses the spine and enters the cranium, in a cranial direction, by way of the subarachnoid space. It moves out of the cranium in a caudal direction from the fourth ventricle through the central canal of the spinal cord. Since the spinal cord has direct soft tissue attachment to the bony segments of the CCJ (see the dentate-ligament spinal cord-distortion hypothesis), a structural misalignment is hypothesized to disrupt the normal CSF flow through the CCJ [11].

Improper flow of the CSF and glymphatic pathways can result in waste buildup and reduced nerve function, including the central vestibular processing anatomy [57]. Venous outflow from the cranium can also be altered by jugular vein compression by the transverse process of the atlas [58]. Dysfunctional craniospinal hydrodynamics has been associated with many neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s (known to lead to orthostatic hypotension and dizziness), multiple sclerosis (MS) (known to lead to dizziness and imbalance), and dementia [59-73]. In fact, an MRI study on MS patients with prior craniocervical trauma found that their upright CSF flow and pressure gradients had significant obstruction [74]. Only further research will help us determine if it plays a role in vestibular pathophysiology.

Spinal cord tension and direct mechanical irritation and venous compression: One of the original hypotheses on how the ASC can result in distal bodily dysfunction is the dentate-ligament spinal cord-distortion hypothesis presented by John D. Grostic Jr [56]. This hypothesis presents two mechanisms: direct mechanical irritation of nerves and venous compression. The spinal cord is directly attached to the foramen magnum, the second and third cervical vertebrae, the posterior longitudinal ligament, rectus capitus posterior minor muscle, and through dural attachment to the periosteum of the atlas [75]. Between the attachments of the nerve roots exist bands of tissue called the dentate ligaments. These ligaments are incredibly strong and have their peak strength within the upper cervical spine [76].

The dorsal spinocerebellar tract (DSCT) ascends on the lateral portion of the spinal cord. The DSCT relays proprioceptive afferents from the periphery to the ipsilateral cerebellum. Due to the DSCT’s anatomical location, it is the most vulnerable to mechanical irritation from inappropriate tension applied by the dentate ligaments, for example from ASC. Mechanical irritation of the DSCT is hypothesized to result in dysafferentation, as described above, which may result in sensations of imbalance. The small veins of the upper cervical spinal cord are scarce compared to other regions of the spine. Mechanical obstruction of these veins can cause stasis of blood and local ischemia. These veins move blood at a very low pressure, predisposing them to easy occlusion by compressive forces [56,76]. Gillilan stated that the dentate ligaments may be a means of transmitting mechanical stress to the cord and resulting in small vein occlusion [77]. Local ischemia by means of venous compression and direct mechanical tension on the DSCT are two theories as to how a CCJ misalignment may affect the normal proprioceptive afferents through the dentate ligaments, causing spinal cord tension. The DSCT carries proprioceptive afferents from the periphery to the cerebellum for higher-order processing. The cerebellum corrects posture based on the information it receives from the DSCT. If the information is faulty due to the mechanism(s) explained above, postural abnormalities (and postural symptoms) may result. This hypothesis also adds fuel to the two previous hypotheses, as cord distortion may result in altered craniospinal hydrodynamics and proprioceptive dysafferentation.

ASC and MD

MD is a vestibular disorder characterized by spontaneous episodes of vertigo, sensorineural hearing loss, and fluctuating aural symptoms [78]. Historically, MD is associated with over-accumulating endolymph in the semicircular canals and otoliths. The most accepted pathophysiology is that this over-accumulation, termed endolymphatic hydrops (EH), damages cochlear anatomy and over-stimulates the peripheral vestibular organs, leading to a unilateral vestibular imbalance, resulting in the symptoms mentioned above [79]. However, recent evidence suggests that EH alone is not enough to cause MD [80]. Endolymph is created by the secretory cells in the vascularis of the cochlea and the dark cells of the labyrinth, which moves to the semicircular canals. It is drained through the endolymphatic duct into the endolymphatic sac. There it extends through the distal vestibular aqueduct and out the external aperture of the aqueduct, where it ends in the epidural space of the posterior cranial fossa. The endolymph has a high K+:Na+ ratio, resembling intra-cellular fluid, as opposed to the perilymph, which has a high Na+:K+ ratio. The perilymph bathes the exterior portion of the membranous labyrinth [81-84].

Not present in the primary literature search because it is a newer publication and not yet indexed is Steward’s retrospective case series on UCT and vestibular rehabilitation on eight patients with vestibular diagnoses [85]. The author measured dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) scores before and after a 30-day plan of care. Of the eight participants, four of them were diagnosed with MD. Their DHI improvement was 64% (Case 1), 28% (Case 2), 92% (Case 3), and 78% (Case 4). It is worth noting that Cases 1-3 received an individual plan of vestibular rehabilitation in addition to UCT, while Case 4 only received UCT. As listed, seven other case reports were found in the literature on UCT and MD’s improvement. Steward’s paper noted an objective reduction of the CCJ misalignment, as visible on X-ray, after the UCLF intervention in all cases.

Also not present in the primary search was Burcon’s paper, which retrospectively reported on the health outcomes of 300 MD patients who underwent UCT care [86]. Of these 300 patients, the average pre-care reported vertigo severity on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the worst) was 8.5. At six weeks post care, the average lowered to 3. In one year, it reduced to 2. At six years, it dropped to 0.8. A notable reported cohort feature was that 100% of the cases had a history of whiplash trauma (cervical acceleration-deceleration injury).

Though the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of MD is still not fully established, we can use contemporary knowledge of vestibular anatomy and physiology to understand what is being affected. Since vertigo is the main vestibular symptom, we can reduce the generating anatomy to a unilateral imbalance of the semicircular canals, the central processing anatomy of the canals, and/or the neurological pathway between the two [78,81,82]. Therefore, further research on the ASC’s association with MD pathophysiology should focus on the intimate connection between the CCJ and this anatomy. Disrupted hydrodynamics of the CSF with a subsequent restriction of endolymph movement due to CCJ misalignment should be evaluated.

ASC and Vestibular Migraine

Vestibular migraine is a migraine disorder that accompanies the vestibular system. It is estimated that it may affect up to 1% of the general population. Though no evidence was found in the primary literature search on UCT and vestibular migraine, a clinical trial on NUCCA intervention on non-vestibular migraine has been published [87]. The study found that NUCCA intervention significantly increased neurologist-measured quality of life measures and had some improved influence on blood and CSF flow patterns post treatment. No adverse events were reported.

ASC and Concussion

It is estimated and theorized that the cervical spine ligaments are injured in every single concussion due to the force and cervical torsion that it takes for a concussion to occur [88-90]. Since the CCJ is the most mobile unit of the cervical spine, it is the least stable, allowing for ligamentous damage, structural misalignment, and ultimately for the ASC to form [91]. Post-concussion syndrome occurs when symptoms last beyond three months [92]. A common symptom of post-concussion syndrome is dizziness. ASC and cervical spine-related dizziness research is complicated when studying concussions due to the vestibular anatomy typically being injured during a concussion. However, Moore’s paper on using NUCCA to intervene with post-concussion patients found objective clinical improvement with many symptoms, including dizziness [27]. Moore also noted an objective reduction of the structural misalignment, as measured on X-ray, after the UCLF intervention in all cases.

ASC and Autonomic Function

A pilot, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial assessed NUCCA intervention on hypertension outcomes [93]. The study concluded, “Restoration of Atlas alignment is associated with marked and sustained reduction in BP similar to the use of two-drug combination therapy” [93]. The mechanisms of how this was possible were discussed in the craniospinal hydrodynamic dysfunction section above. Since this study found that realignment of the ASC achieved ideal blood pressure, it would be wise to follow up this study in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and orthostatic hypotension patients to assess for improvements in lightheadedness, dizziness, and improved orthostatic blood pressure.

Cervical Dizziness (CD)

In the Bárány Society’s consensus paper on CD, appropriate terminology is discussed. They state, “The aetiology is unclear, or at least the data to support underlying mechanisms in humans are inconclusive, and there is no diagnostic test, the term Cervicogenic implies a mechanistic knowledge that is currently lacking. Hence, we propose the term Cervical” [39]. Since our paper discusses the ASC as a specific etiology of dizziness, we have decided not to use the terms “cervical dizziness” or “cervicogenic dizziness” for discussion.

Acute Cerebral Vascular Ischemia and BPPV

As discussed in this review, many conditions can generate dizziness. Saying this, there are some that UCT intervention should not be studied for efficacy. Firstly, acute cerebral vascular ischemia, such as a stroke. A stroke is an acute life-threatening emergency that should only be treated in the emergency medicine setting [94]. Secondly, classic BPPV. Accurately diagnosed BPPV has nearly a 100% cure rate with the appropriately administered canalith repositioning maneuver [3].

ASC Without Dizziness

Studies exist that document patients presenting with ASC, yet they do not have dizziness [87,93]. A fair question is, why doesn’t every patient who presents with an ASC also have dizziness? Since four theories were reported as to how the ASC can generate dizziness, it may be a combination of the pathogenic mechanisms plus genetic predisposition, previous vestibular trauma, demographic factors, and lifestyle, amongst many other variables that are required. In other words, the ASC might be a contributor to dizziness generation rather than a cause. Studies must be conducted to answer this question without speculation.

Future Research

While healthcare and health sciences continue to move towards an evidence-informed model, resources must be allocated to conducting gold-standard, high-quality, placebo-controlled, statistically measured experimental research. Since the NUCCA intervention uses very minimal force, most patients report that they are unaware that an intervention took place during care. This puts NUCCA in a strong position to remove participant bias by implementing a placebo-control in clinical trial research, such as used in the NUCCA hypertension study [93]. This review has outlined four gaps in the literature and expresses a need for the following:

Clinical trials: Well-designed, blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled clinical trial research should be conducted to examine NUCCA’s effect on specific vestibular conditions. Since vestibular diagnosis has historically been weak, every attempt should be made to accurately include only participants that meet the current and specific diagnostic criteria per inclusion of each study. This may include collaborating with specialist such as neurotologists and radiologists. In addition to objective dizziness changes, the studies should also assess quality of life measures. A foundational starting point may be to form a practice-based research network (PBRN) and compile data on many different vestibular diagnoses and how they improve under NUCCA care. Clinical trials should then be conducted on the diagnoses that responded the most favorably during the PBRN. This strategy will help focus resources and save on research costs. Studies must follow the NUCCA protocol closely and observe the Restoration Principle to accurately assess the intervention’s effect [8].

MD: A further and deeper exploration of the ASC’s possible contribution to MD pathophysiology. Future studies should examine the relationship between the CSF and the endolymph and whether the ASC affects endolymph hydrodynamics. Also, studies should assess for a proprioceptive contribution from the ASC to MD pathophysiology. Recent advances in MRI technology have allowed the endolymph to be viewed, which is helpful in future studies [95].

The ASC’s affect on vestibular anatomy: To better understand the neurophysiological changes from the ASC, suboccipital muscle mechanoreceptor afferent discharge should be compared to individuals presenting with ASC versus a normal group. Sensorimotor testing may be valuable to determine differences between the ASC and normal groups. Further and deeper exploration of how the ASC can have negative consequences and imbalances in relation to the peripheral vestibular organs and the central vestibular processing anatomy is warranted. For example, testing if the ASC has direct negative sensory consequences to the vestibular semicircular canals.

The ASC’s affect on craniospinal hydrodynamics: Though Flanagan’s paper examined how the CCJ can be a “choke point” for craniospinal fluid movement, it did not directly examine the ASC as a cause [11]. Woodfield et al. found improved cerebral spinal fluid flow patterns post-NUCCA intervention of the ASC in migraine cases, laying a solid foundation to follow up this study for a better understanding of hydrodynamics as they relate to the ASC [86].

Conclusions

The present review describes multiple theoretical mechanisms by which ASC-evoked dizziness may be mitigated by UCLF intervention, and presents a literature synthesis with observational evidence suggesting that further studies (randomized controlled trials (RCTs)) are warranted to explore the relationship between upper cervical chiropractic care and resolution of dizziness symptoms. Such studies may inform clinicians of novel intervention strategies for patients presenting with complaints of dizziness, thereby augmenting a current deficit in success of treatment of this symptom.

© Copyright 2025 Steward. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.79310

References

  1. Neuhauser HK: The epidemiology of dizziness and vertigo. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016, 137:67-82. 10.1016/B978-0-444-63437-5.00005-4
  2. Lin HW, Bhattacharyya N: Balance disorders in the elderly: epidemiology and functional impact. Laryngoscope. 2012, 122:1858-61. 10.1002/lary.23376
  3. Bhattacharyya N, Gubbels SP, Schwartz SR, et al.: Clinical practice guideline: benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017, 156:S1-S47. 10.1177/0194599816689667
  4. van Vugt VA, Bas G, van der Wouden JC, et al.: Prognosis and survival of older patients with dizziness in primary care: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Ann Fam Med. 2020, 18:100-9. 10.1370/afm.2478
  5. Peguero-Rodriguez E, Perez-Patiño J, Ballve JL, et al.: Starting point for improving the approach to vertigo in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2023, 73:bjgp23X734205. 10.3399/bjgp23X734205
  6. Bisdorff A, Von Brevern M, Lempert T, Newman-Toker DE: Classification of vestibular symptoms: towards an international classification of vestibular disorders. J Vestib Res. 2009, 19:1-13. 10.3233/VES-2009-0343
  7. Kim HA, Bisdorff A, Bronstein AM, et al.: Hemodynamic orthostatic dizziness/vertigo: diagnostic criteria. J Vestib Res. 2019, 29:45-56. 10.3233/VES-190655
  8. Standards of Care and Practice Guidelines. (2019). Accessed: February 16, 2025: https://nucca.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/NUCCA_StandardsOFCareAndPractice_102519.pdf.
  9. Woodfield HC 3rd, York C, Rochester RP, Bales S, Beebe M, Salminen B, Scholten JN: Craniocervical chiropractic procedures – a précis of upper cervical chiropractic. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2015, 59:173-92.
  10. Taylor CS, Mangano FT: Craniocervical junction, abnormalities. Encyclopedia of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery . Kountakis SE (ed): Springer Reference, New York; 2013. 619-28. 10.1007/978-3-642-23499-6_559
  11. Flanagan MF: The role of the craniocervical junction in craniospinal hydrodynamics and neurodegenerative conditions. Neurol Res Int. 2015, 2015:794829. 10.1155/2015/794829
  12. WHO Guidelines on Basic Training and Safety in Chiropractic. (2024). Accessed: August 1, 2024: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/43352.
  13. Rochester RP: Neck pain and disability outcomes following chiropractic upper cervical care: a retrospective case series. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2009, 53:173-85.
  14. Palmer DD: The Science, Art and Philosophy of Chiropractic. Portland Printing House Company, Portland; 1910.
  15. Homola S: Chiropractic: history and overview of theories and methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006, 444:236-42. 10.1097/01.blo.0000200258.95865.87
  16. NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association. Thomas MD (ed): National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Research Association, Monroe; 2002. https://nucca.org/store/nucca-textbook/.
  17. Palmer BJ: The Science of Chiropractic Volume 1. Palmer School of Chiropractic, Davenport; 1906.
  18. Eriksen K, Grostic RJ: History of the Grostic/orthospinology procedure. Orthospinology Procedures: An Evidenced-Based Approach to Spinal Care. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia; 2007. 1-36.
  19. Historical perspective: the evolution of the Grostic-Gregory protocol. NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association. Thomas MD (ed): National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Research Association, Monroe; 2002.
  20. Landholm-Duvall J, Hasick DG, Ndetan H, Hart JF, Dickholtz M Jr, Lapenski CP: Inter-examiner agreement of the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association analysis of the atlas subluxation complex in a 3-view upper cervical radiographic series. J Chiropr Med. 2023, 22:189-96. 10.1016/j.jcm.2023.04.001
  21. Schrock JJ: Eight adjustic phases. NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association. Thomas MD (ed): National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Research Association, Monroe; 2002.
  22. Denton KE: Introduction to biomechanics. NUCCA Protocols and Perspectives: A Textbook for the National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Association. Thomas MD (ed): National Upper Cervical Chiropractic Research Association, Monroe; 2002.
  23. The Upper Cervical Monograph. (1973). Accessed: February 13, 2025: https://ucmonograph.org/.
  24. Palmer DD, Palmer BJ: Volume 1 – The Science of Chiropractic. The Palmer School of Chiropractic, Davenport; 1906.
  25. Berner N, Steward T: Resolution of Meniere’s disease in a 68-year-old female following upper cervical chiropractic to reduce atlas subluxation using orthospinology technique: a case study & review of literature. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2020, 2020:8-14.
  26. Chung J: Improvement in post-concussion syndrome in two females using low-force upper cervical: a case series & review of the literature. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2019, 2019:48-55.
  27. Moore J : Chiropractic management of the craniocervical junction in post-concussion syndrome: a case series. J Contemp Chiropr. 2019, 2:92-102.
  28. Finn O, Ierano J, Doyle M: Resolution of cervicogenic dizziness and upper cervical pain in a 49-year-old female receiving atlas orthogonal chiropractic care: a case report. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2022, 2022:7-12.
  29. Burcon MT: Resolution of vertigo, restored hearing & improved quality of life in a patient with Meniere’s disease & failed craniectomy: a case report & review of the literature. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2021, 2021:10-19.
  30. Osborne C, Rauch B: Improvement in heart rate, heart rate variability & reduction in dysautonomia in a 74-year-old female undergoing upper cervical chiropractic care: a case report & review of the literature. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2021, 2021:1-9.
  31. Null SA, Null LA: Resolution of post-traumatic epilepsy, headaches & dizziness following upper cervical chiropractic care in a 19-year-old male: case study & review of the literature. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2019, 2019:11-18.
  32. Ball R: Resolution of anosmia and other symptoms in a patient with a primary central nervous system tumor following upper cervical chiropractic care. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2017, 2017:31-9.
  33. Burcon MT: Resolution of long standing intractable bilateral Meniere’s disease & multiple health challenges following upper cervical specific chiropractic care: a case report. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2023, 2023:1-12.
  34. Belcher J, Barnes N: Resolution of Meniere’s and restoration of hearing following reduction of vertebral subluxation utilizing atlas orthogonal chiropractic adjustment: a case report. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2022, 2022:13-15.
  35. Malachowski T, Britt C : Improvement in Meniere’s disease following upper cervical chiropractic care: a case report & review of the literature. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2020, 2020:28-38.
  36. Grey J, Ellis R: Reduction of symptoms of Meniere’s disease & trigeminal neuralgia following upper cervical specific chiropractic care: a case study. Ann Vert Sublux Res. 2019, 2019:127-32.
  37. Chung J, O’Connell C: Resolution of symptoms in a patient suffering from Meniere’s disease following specific upper cervical chiropractic care: a case study & review of literature. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2017, 2017:1-7.
  38. Pennington D, Miller J: Successful chiropractic management of a patient with Meniere’s disease post-vestibular nerve section: a case report. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2015, 2015:34-40.
  39. Seemungal BM, Agrawal Y, Bisdorff A, et al.: The Bárány Society position on ‘cervical dizziness’. J Vestib Res. 2022, 32:487-99. 10.3233/VES-220202
  40. McLain RF, Pickar JG: Mechanoreceptor endings in human thoracic and lumbar facet joints. Spine. 1998, 23:168-73. 10.1097/00007632-199801150-00004
  41. Sung YH: Upper cervical spine dysfunction and dizziness. J Exerc Rehabil. 2020, 16:385-91. 10.12965/jer.2040612.306
  42. Eriksen K: Upper cervical neurology. Upper Cervical Subluxation Complex: A Review of the Chiropractic and Medical Literature. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadephia; 2004. 61-72.
  43. Li Y, Yang L, Dai C, Peng B: Proprioceptive cervicogenic dizziness: a narrative review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment. J Clin Med. 2022, 11:6293. 10.3390/jcm11216293
  44. Damadian RV, Chu D: The possible role of craniocervical trauma and abnormal CSF hydrodynamics in the genesis of multiple sclerosis. Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR. 2011, 41:1-17.
  45. Mandolesi S, Marceca G, Conicello S, et al.: Upper cervical vertebral subluxation in multiple sclerosis subjects with chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: a pilot study. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2013, 2013:65-70.
  46. Woodfield HC 3rd, Becker W, Hasick DG, Rose S: Observed changes in quality of life measures and cerebrospinal fluid flow parameters in migraine subjects receiving chiropractic care. J Altern Complement Med. 2014, 20:10.1089/acm.2014.5131.abstract
  47. Ahmad FB, Anderson RN: The leading causes of death in the US for 2020. JAMA. 2021, 325:1829-30. 10.1001/jama.2021.5469
  48. Novak V, Novak P, Spies JM, Low PA: Autoregulation of cerebral blood flow in orthostatic hypotension. Stroke. 1998, 29:104-11. 10.1161/01.str.29.1.104
  49. Low PA: Neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: pathophysiology and diagnosis. Am J Manag Care. 2015, 21:s248-57.
  50. Flammer J, Pache M, Resink T: Vasospasm, its role in the pathogenesis of diseases with particular reference to the eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001, 20:319-49. 10.1016/s1350-9462(00)00028-8
  51. Panjabi M, Dvorak J, Crisco J 3rd, Oda T, Hilibrand A, Grob D: Flexion, extension, and lateral bending of the upper cervical spine in response to alar ligament transections. J Spinal Disord. 1991, 4:157-67. 10.1097/00002517-199106000-00005
  52. Miao HL, Zhang DY, Wang T, Jiao XT, Jiao LQ: Clinical importance of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery: a review of the literature. Int J Med Sci. 2020, 17:3005-19. 10.7150/ijms.49137
  53. Tudose RC, Rusu MC, Hostiuc S: The vertebral artery: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the current literature. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023, 13:2036. 10.3390/diagnostics13122036
  54. Fox MW, Piepgras DG, Bartleson JD: Anterolateral decompression of the atlantoaxial vertebral artery for symptomatic positional occlusion of the vertebral artery: case report. J Neurosurg. 1995, 83:737-40. 10.3171/jns.1995.83.4.0737
  55. Yoo H, Mihaila DM: Neuroanatomy, Vestibular Pathways. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, USA; 2022.
  56. Grostic JD: Dentate ligament-cord distortion hypothesis. Chiropr Res J. 1988, 1:47-55.
  57. Nedergaard M: Garbage truck of the brain. Science. 2013, 340:1529-30. 10.1126/science.1240514
  58. Seoane E, Rhoton AL Jr: Compression of the internal jugular vein by the transverse process of the atlas as the cause of cerebellar hemorrhage after supratentorial craniotomy. Surg Neurol. 1999, 51:500-5. 10.1016/S0090-3019(97)00476-X
  59. Flanagan MF: Craniocervical syndrome: its potential role in Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and other diseases of the brain: part I: cranial hydrodynamics and the sutures. Dynamic Chiropractic. 2001,
  60. Akiguchi I, Ishii M, Watanabe Y, et al.: Shunt-responsive parkinsonism and reversible white matter lesions in patients with idiopathic NPH. J Neurol. 2008, 255:1392-9. 10.1007/s00415-008-0928-1
  61. Ishii M, Kawamata T, Akiguchi I, Yagi H, Watanabe Y, Watanabe T, Mashimo H: Parkinsonian symptomatology may correlate with CT findings before and after shunting in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Parkinsons Dis. 2010, 2010:201089. 10.4061/2010/201089
  62. Fernández-Seara MA, Mengual E, Vidorreta M, et al.: Cortical hypoperfusion in Parkinson’s disease assessed using arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2012, 59:2743-50. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.033
  63. Flanagan MF: The craniocervical spine and multiple sclerosis, part 1 of 2. Dynamic Chiropractic. 2003,
  64. Benedict RH, Bruce JM, Dwyer MG, et al.: Neocortical atrophy, third ventricular width, and cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. 2006, 63:1301-6. 10.1001/archneur.63.9.1301
  65. Martola J, Stawiarz L, Fredrikson S, et al.: Rate of ventricular enlargement in multiple sclerosis: a nine-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Acta Radiol. 2008, 49:570-9. 10.1080/02841850802039898
  66. Algin O, Taskapilioglu O, Hakyemez B, Parlak M: Unusual patient with multiple sclerosis and shunt-responsive normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neuroradiol. 2012, 22:101-4. 10.1007/s00062-011-0068-3
  67. Müller M, Esser R, Kötter K, Voss J, Müller A, Stellmes P: Third ventricular enlargement in early stages of multiple sclerosis is a predictor of motor and neuropsychological deficits: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2013, 10:e003582. 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003582
  68. Mandolesi S, Mora F, d’Alessandro A, et al.: Increased size of third ventricle in patients with multiple sclerosis and chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. J Vasc Diagn. 2014, 2:91-7. 10.2147/jvd.s56519
  69. Thomsen AM, Børgesen SE, Bruhn P, Gjerris F: Prognosis of dementia in normal-pressure hydrocephalus after a shunt operation. Ann Neurol. 1986, 20:304-10. 10.1002/ana.410200306
  70. Dippel DW, Habbema JD: Probabilistic diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and other treatable cerebral lesions in dementia. J Neurol Sci. 1993, 119:123-33. 10.1016/0022-510x(93)90124-h
  71. Bergsneider M, Peacock WJ, Mazziotta JC, Becker DP: Beneficial effect of siphoning in treatment of adult hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol. 1999, 56:1224-9. 10.1001/archneur.56.10.1224
  72. Duinkerke A, Williams MA, Rigamonti D, Hillis AE: Cognitive recovery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2004, 17:179-84. 10.1097/01.wnn.0000124916.16017.6a
  73. Chaudhry P, Kharkar S, Heidler-Gary J, et al.: Characteristics and reversibility of dementia in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Behav Neurol. 2007, 18:149-58. 10.1155/2007/456281
  74. Damadian RV, Chu D: The possible role of cranio-cervical trauma and abnormal CSF hydrodynamics in the genesis of multiple sclerosis. Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR. 2011, 41:1-17.
  75. Warwick R, Williams PL: Gray’s Anatomy, 35th British Edition. W.B. Saunders Company, 1973.
  76. Eriksen K: Upper cervical neurology. Upper Cervical Subluxation Complex: A Review of the Chiropractic and Medical Literature. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia; 2022. 60-1.
  77. Gillilan LA: Veins of the spinal cord. Anatomic details; suggested clinical applications. Neurology. 1970, 20:860. 10.1212/wnl.20.9.860
  78. Lopez-Escamez JA, Carey J, Chung WH, et al.: Diagnostic criteria for Menière’s disease. J Vestib Res. 2015, 25:1-7. 10.3233/VES-150549
  79. Rauch SD, Merchant SN, Thedinger BA: Meniere’s syndrome and endolymphatic hydrops. Double-blind temporal bone study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989, 98:873-83. 10.1177/000348948909801108
  80. Foster CA, Breeze RE: Endolymphatic hydrops in Ménière’s disease: cause, consequence, or epiphenomenon?. Otol Neurotol. 2013, 34:1210-4. 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829e83df
  81. Hain TC, Helminski J: Anatomy and physiology of the normal vestibular system. Vestibular Rehabilitation. Herdman SJ, Clendaniel RA (ed): F.A. David Company, 2014;
  82. Baloh RW, Honrubia V: Clinical neurophysiology of the vestibular system. Contemp Neurol Ser. 1979, 18:1-21.
  83. Goldberg JM, Wilson VJ, Cullen KE, et al.: Structure of the vestibular labyrinth. The Vestibular System: A Sixth Sense. Goldberg JM, Wilson VJ, Cullen KE, et al. (ed): Oxford University Press, New York; 2012. 22-44. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195167085.003.0002
  84. Kingma H, van de Berg R: Anatomy, physiology, and physics of the peripheral vestibular system. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Furman J, Lempert T (ed): Elsevier, Cambridge, USA; 2016. 137:1-16.
  85. Steward T: Improvement of dizziness following an upper cervical chiropractic technique and individualized vestibular rehabilitation program: a retrospective case series. J Contemp Chiropr. 2023, 6:195-206.
  86. Burcon MT: Health outcomes following cervical specific protocol in 300 patients with Meniere’s followed over six years. J Upper Cervical Chiropr Res. 2016, 2016:13-23.
  87. Woodfield HC 3rd, Hasick DG, Becker WJ, Rose MS, Scott JN: Effect of atlas vertebrae realignment in subjects with migraine: an observational pilot study. Biomed Res Int. 2015, 2015:630472. 10.1155/2015/630472
  88. Cheever K, Kawata K, Tierney R, Galgon A: Cervical injury assessments for concussion evaluation: a review. J Athl Train. 2016, 51:1037-44. 10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.15
  89. Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N: Whiplash injury. Pain. 1994, 58:283-307. 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90123-6
  90. Schneider KJ, Meeuwisse WH, Kang J, Schneider GM, Emery CA: Preseason reports of neck pain, dizziness, and headache as risk factors for concussion in male youth ice hockey players. Clin J Sport Med. 2013, 23:267-72. 10.1097/JSM.0b013e318281f09f
  91. Phuntsok R, Ellis BJ, Herron MR, Provost CW, Dailey AT, Brockmeyer DL: The occipitoatlantal capsular ligaments are the primary stabilizers of the occipitoatlantal joint in the craniocervical junction: a finite element analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019, 30:593-601. 10.3171/2018.10.SPINE181102
  92. Permenter CM, Fernández-de Thomas RJ: Postconcussive Syndrome. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, USA; 2023.
  93. Bakris G, Dickholtz M Sr, Meyer PM, et al.: Atlas vertebra realignment and achievement of arterial pressure goal in hypertensive patients: a pilot study. J Hum Hypertens. 2007, 21:347-52. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002133
  94. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al.: Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019, 50:e344-418. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211
  95. Kenis C, Crins T, Bernaerts A, Casselman J, Foer B: Diagnosis of Menière’s disease on MRI: feasibility at 1.5 Tesla. Acta Radiol. 2022, 63:810-13. 10.1177/02841851211016478

Related Articles

Load More

Resources:

  • World Health Organisation (WHO)
  • PubMed: National Library of Medicine

     

    ⚠️Warning:

    All content on this website belongs to its authors and publishers and is protected by copyright. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or other use of the content is prohibited. Prior written permission is required for any use. Copyright infringement may lead to legal consequences. Thank You

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Articles

Load More